Sweden To Ban Alternative Media

By changing the constitution, the Swedish government wants to prohibit websites that reveal the ethnicity of convicted criminals, Fria Tider reports.

It is through a change in the Freedom of the press and the freedom of expression Act that Stefan Löfven and his government want to prohibit popular Swedish sites such as Lexbase and Fria Tider, referring to the fact that they contain “sensitive personal data.” Neither alternative media nor any of the sites are explicitly mentioned in the bill, but the company behind Lexbase, Verifiera AB, is one of the referral bodies.

When the government sent out the first version of the bill to Swedish leftist universities and other referral bodies, it was met with harsh criticism. The government had namely proposed to ban the publication of data revealing “race” — something that is a social construction according to the official ideology in Sweden and other parts of the United States-controlled part of the world.

The Faculty of Law at the Lund University opposes the use of the expression and instead proposes that the wording “concept of race” is to be used. At Uppsala University, the Faculty of Law replies that “race” should be replaced by “ethnic origin, skin color or other similar relationship.”

If the law passes, it could mean an end to the truth coming out of Sweden, and a total victory for fake news, represented by SVT, Expressen, Aftonbladet and other news organizations that are spreading disinformation to keep people from…

Read more

  • Zaphod Braden

    Just pathetic …. Time for the Swedes to sharpen their swords & axes and go VIKING on the PEDOpriests & politicians that are betraying them. …….

  • Ingold Inglorion

    Fuck Sweden. They were “occupied territory” the moment they elected the feminist “government.” I won’t waste any sympathy on them.

  • EJ Doyle
  • Stop Bush and Clinton

    It’s hardly “banning the alternative media”. They’re imposing a censorship rule on listing the ethnicity of convicted criminals. Nothing more, nothing less.

    It’s certainly a step towards banning free speech and independent media (and clearly for the purpose of hiding the fact that their government’s immigration policies have failed) – but it’s not like they’re banning any alternative thought, or even real news like “9/11 was an inside job with Mossad complicity”, or “The West is in Syria illegally, Russia is there on Syria’s invitation”.

    I disapprove of any censorship, but I also disapprove of alarmist headlines that don’t match the truth. This is like reporting “Trump used poison gas against Russia” when what actually happened is that he farted when Putin was sitting next to him.

  • Alabama Mothman

    Are we absolutely sure that nazi’s lost WWII. It sure doesnt look like it from here.

  • desertspeaks

    You will only hear and see your government approved fraudulent media from now on! You shall not do otherwise because we cannot control the message if you do. Now stop listening/reading facts and truths that have not been approved for your consumption and regurgitation!